How to review a journal article example?

"We suggest reading the content numerous times before criticizing it, making notes, and adding annotations.", "Take notes while you read on crucial elements such as the thesis, purpose, research questions, hypotheses, methods, evidence, significant findings, tone, and publishing information."


How to evaluate purpose and argument?

  • How well do the background, context, and thesis in the introduction communicate the purpose?
  • How accurately does the abstract capture the main ideas and contention of the article?
  • How effectively does the experiment's or observation's goal fill a gap in the literature?
  • How well is the argument/purpose presented and covered in the text's body?
  • How effectively does the conversation stay on topic?

What is an article review?

This particular professional paper writing style necessitates a high level of in-depth study and a carefully organized argumentation. It is a summary, classification, analysis, and comparison of the literature on a given topic that serves as a critical and constructive appraisal.


  • How many articles should you review?
  • In what format you should cite your article? (MLA, APA, ASA, Chicago, etc)
  • What length your article should be?
  • Do you need a call to action to a theme or central idea within the article?
  • Do you have enough background information?

What are all the types of reviews?

There are “3” types of article reviews. They are,

1. Journal article review
2. Research article review
3. Science article review


A journal article review assesses a publication's merits and faults, much like all other reviews do. The reader must be given an analysis and interpretation that show the significance of the piece by a competent paper author.


By evaluating the study methodology utilized and holding that material in retrospect for analysis and critique, it varies from a journal article review.


Any topic related to science is included in scientific article reviews. Scientific publications frequently provide more background material that can be used to conduct a more thorough analysis of the publication.


  • step 1Write the title
  • step 2Cite the article
  • step 3Article identification
  • step 4Introduction
  • step 5Summarize the article
  • step 6Critique it
  • step 7 Craft a conclusion


Send us your requirement, We will analyze the correct source for your topic. Then you can talk with our experts. Finally, you will get the power-packed one.

Looking through relevant article review examples can be beneficial for you in the following ways:
  • To get you introduced to the key works of experts in your research field.
  • To assist you in locating the influential figures working in a specific scientific discipline.
  • To help you to find solid references or arguments for your review
  • To aid in your knowledge acquisition and assist you become an authority in this particular sector.

Need a hand from our professionals?

How do you write the journal article review?

Detailed instructions for reviewing a manuscript

Review Report Format Overview

The review report's format differs between journals. Others take a more formal approach, while some adhere to an informal structure.

The initial reading

After accepting the review invitation and receiving the article abstract, you should already be familiar with the manuscript's objectives, significant findings, and conclusions. Make a note right away if you don't need to provide feedback on how to make those areas better.

Considerations for the First Reading

Try to keep the following considerations in mind as they will aid in forming your general opinion:

  • What is the primary issue that the study aims to address? Is it fascinating and pertinent?
  • How unique is the subject? Compared to other published materials, what does it bring to the field?
  • Is the paper written well? Is the writing readable and clear?
  • Are the findings in line with the facts and justifications offered? Do they answer the primary query?
  • What value do tables and figures add if they are included in the paper?
  • Do they contribute to understanding or are they unnecessary?


Identifying Flaws

Even while you should read the entire report, choosing wisely can save time by highlighting significant issues early on.

You could look at:

  • Samples are used in analytical papers
  • The appropriate application of control experiments
  • The accuracy of the process data
  • The consistency of sampling in temporal research
  • The reliability of the research questions, the application of a thorough methodology, and the methodical analysis of the findings (in qualitative research)
  • You could look at the major flaws such as
  • Inadequate data
  • Unclear data tables
  • Data that contradict the conclusions or are inconsistent with one another
  • Confirmatory information doesn't significantly advance our understanding unless there are compelling reasons to do so.
  • If a significant issue is discovered, make sure to include citations, your justification, and clear supporting data.
You may be interested in getting to know more about REVIEW PAPER WRITING

Concluding the First Reading

Make sure to include any major problems you observed in your notes. Even if the journal has a specific reporting format, this draught will still aid with the organization of your ideas.

Rejection After the First Reading

Make sure you read the entire document, even if you think an article has significant issues. This is crucial because you might uncover some very great ideas that you can share with the author. This might be useful for their upcoming submissions.